Jimenez, Raynol Jr.
This text of Jimenez, Raynol Jr. (Jimenez, Raynol Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,230-01
EX PARTE RAYNOL JIMENEZ, JR., Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 4766A IN THE 110TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FLOYD COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault of a family member in exchange for a sentence
of fourteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application
for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this
Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because his trial counsel failed to advise
him that he was eligible for community supervision from a jury. Applicant alleges that he had a
favorable psychological evaluation and risk assessment, and that there were numerous witnesses who
would have testified favorably about his character. Although the transcript of the plea proceedings
shows that Applicant was advised of his options for disposing of the charges, and that he 2
acknowledged his understanding of the consequences of the plea, the record does not show whether
Applicant was specifically advised about the availability of community supervision from a jury.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Brady v. United States,
397 U.S. 742 (1970). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial
counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. Specifically, trial counsel shall state whether he advised
Applicant of the availability of community supervision from a jury, and of the likelihood of
obtaining community supervision from a jury. Trial counsel shall state what advice, if any, he gave
to Applicant with regard to whether he should plead guilty pursuant to the plea agreement, or elect
a jury trial or a bench trial.
In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel
to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or
retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and whether but for counsel’s alleged errors, Applicant would not have
pleaded guilty but would have insisted on going to trial on the charges. The trial court may make
any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, 3
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: November 10, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimenez, Raynol Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-raynol-jr-texcrimapp-2021.