Jimenez (Juan) v. State
This text of Jimenez (Juan) v. State (Jimenez (Juan) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
jury room and denied the motion for a mistrial. See id. The record before this court supports the district court's decision and we conclude Jimenez- Gonzalez fails to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED."
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge Elko County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Elko County District Attorney Elko County Clerk
'Although we filed the fast track statement and appendix and fast track response, these documents fail to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The fast track briefs do not contain margins in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) and the fast track statement does not contain adequate citation to the appendix, see NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C). Further, the appendix does not contain a single index identifying each document included in all volumes. NRAP 3C(e)(2)(C); NRAP 30(c)(2). Counsel for the parties are cautioned that the failure to comply with applicable rules in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n); Smith v. Emery, 109 Nev. 737, 743, 856 P.2d 1386, 1390 (1993).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2 • -, - -•• ••• • • •.'••
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jimenez (Juan) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jimenez-juan-v-state-nev-2013.