Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Bates

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Bates

603 So. 2d 1109, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 403, 1992 WL 200210

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 21, 1992·No. 2910291·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The appellant in this worker’s compensation case fails to cite any authority to support its contention that the trial court erred in this case. The appellant simply argues that the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings and its judgment that the appellee is permanently and totally disabled.

The record reveals extensive legal evidence to support the trial court’s findings, and a reasonable view of that evidence certainly supports the trial court’s judgment. Ex parte Eastwood Foods, Inc., 575 So.2d 91 (Ala.1991).

AFFIRMED.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The appellant in this worker’s compensation case fails to cite any authority to support its contention that the trial court erred in this case. The appellant simply argues that the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings and its judgment that the appellee is permanently and totally disabled.

The record reveals extensive legal evidence to support the trial court’s findings, and a reasonable view of that evidence certainly supports the trial court’s judgment. Ex parte Eastwood Foods, Inc., 575 So.2d 91 (Ala.1991).

AFFIRMED.

THIGPEN and RUSSELL, JJ., concur.

Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Bates, 603 So. 2d 1109, 1992 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 403, 1992 WL 200210 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

603 So. 2d 1109 (Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related