Jim Stephens v. Portia McElroy
This text of Jim Stephens v. Portia McElroy (Jim Stephens v. Portia McElroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ January 17, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24A0781. JIM STEPHENS v. PORTIA MCELROY.
The magistrate court entered a judgment in favor of Portia McElroy and against Jim Stephens d/b/a Jim’s Paint and Body Shop (“Stephens”). Stephens appealed to state court. The state court entered a judgment for McElroy, and Stephens filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021) (punctuation omitted). Stephens’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/17/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jim Stephens v. Portia McElroy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-stephens-v-portia-mcelroy-gactapp-2024.