Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin.

DecidedApril 22, 2022

Docket04-22-00157-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin. (Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00157-CV

Jim SCHMIDT individually and D/B/A The Goat Company and The Wildlife Ranch, Appellants

v.

Dr. Charles W. GRAHAM, DVM and Tyler Graham d/b/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen Mcfarlin., Appellees

From the 452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas Trial Court No. 185791 Stephen Ellis, Judge Presiding

ORDER The clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this appeal were due on April 15, 2022. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record was timely filed. On April 18, 2022, the official court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant has failed to (1) request preparation of the reporter’s record in writing and (2) pay or make satisfactory arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b).

We therefore ORDER appellant to file written proof in this court no later than ten (10) days after the date of this order showing that: (1) he has requested that the official court reporter prepare the reporter’s record in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6; and (2) either the court reporter’s fee for preparation of the reporter’s record has been paid or satisfactory payment arrangements have been made, or appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6, 20.1(a); TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of April, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00157-CV

Jim SCHMIDT individually and D/B/A The Goat Company and The Wildlife Ranch, Appellants

v.

Dr. Charles W. GRAHAM, DVM and Tyler Graham d/b/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen Mcfarlin., Appellees

From the 452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas Trial Court No. 185791 Stephen Ellis, Judge Presiding

ORDER The clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this appeal were due on April 15, 2022. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record was timely filed. On April 18, 2022, the official court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant has failed to (1) request preparation of the reporter’s record in writing and (2) pay or make satisfactory arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b).

We therefore ORDER appellant to file written proof in this court no later than ten (10) days after the date of this order showing that: (1) he has requested that the official court reporter prepare the reporter’s record in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6; and (2) either the court reporter’s fee for preparation of the reporter’s record has been paid or satisfactory payment arrangements have been made, or appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6, 20.1(a); TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of April, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham, DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/a, Hamilton Commission Company, Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen McFarlin., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-schmidt-individually-and-dba-the-goat-company-and-the-wildlife-ranch-texapp-2022.