Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company

DecidedJune 1, 2006

Docket13-05-00500-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company (Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-500-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

JIM R. GARVEY, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

H. B. FULLER COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JIM R. GARVEY, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 02-05234-G. The clerk=s record was received on January 24, 2006.

Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. In addition, it appeared that several parties had filed suggestions of bankruptcy; however, the record fails to reflect that any bankruptcy stay has been lifted or the case otherwise remanded to the trial court. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 1st day of June, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-500-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

JIM R. GARVEY, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

H. B. FULLER COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, JIM R. GARVEY, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 02-05234-G. The clerk=s record was received on January 24, 2006.

Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order. In addition, it appeared that several parties had filed suggestions of bankruptcy; however, the record fails to reflect that any bankruptcy stay has been lifted or the case otherwise remanded to the trial court. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 1st day of June, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jim R. Garvey v. H. B. Fuller Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-r-garvey-v-h-b-fuller-company-texapp-2006.