Jim Quinlan Chevrolet Co. v. Adams

456 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2180, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1984
DocketNo. 84-1508
StatusPublished

This text of 456 So. 2d 974 (Jim Quinlan Chevrolet Co. v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jim Quinlan Chevrolet Co. v. Adams, 456 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2180, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition denied for the sole reason that there is a full, adequate and complete remedy available to petitioners by appeal after final judgment. See Whiteside v. Johnson, 351 So.2d 759 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whiteside v. Johnson
351 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2180, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-quinlan-chevrolet-co-v-adams-fladistctapp-1984.