Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Texas

Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher

DecidedFebruary 21, 2019

Docket11-19-00017-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher (Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Jim L. Fletcher, * From the 358th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. D-18-06-0601-CV.

Vs. No. 11-19-00017-CV * February 21, 2019

Edward Jones Trust Company * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion and James Clinton Fletcher, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment) (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jim L. Fletcher.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

Jim L. Fletcher, * From the 358th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. D-18-06-0601-CV.

Vs. No. 11-19-00017-CV * February 21, 2019

Edward Jones Trust Company * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion and James Clinton Fletcher, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment) (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jim L. Fletcher.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jim L. Fletcher v. Edward Jones Trust Company and James Clinton Fletcher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-l-fletcher-v-edward-jones-trust-company-and-james-clinton-fletcher-texapp-2019.