Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 17, 2019·No. 01-18-00913-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy

Appellate case number: 01-18-00913-CV

Trial court case number: 1091620

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellee’s counsel, E. F. Mano DeAyala and Andrew C. Wright, have filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel, explaining that appellee, Karen Tracy, passed away pending this appeal and counsel is not authorized to proceed with representation of appellee’s estate. Appellants, Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes, filed a response opposing appellee’s counsel’s withdrawal before a personal representative of appellee’s estate is appointed and substituted in this appeal. The parties have indicated that appellee’s state is in probate but no personal representative has yet been appointed. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 authorizes a court to permit an attorney to withdraw from representation of a client on appropriate terms and conditions. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, the Court denies appellee’s motion to withdraw without prejudice to refiling after the terms and conditions set out below are met.

The Court abates this appeal and remands to the trial court to hold a hearing, within 60 days of the date of this order, to determine whether any heir or personal representative can substitute for appellee in this appeal, and whether the heir or representative wishes to file a brief. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 151, 152, 154; Casillas v. Cano, 79 S.W.3d 587, 591 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.). The trial court may extend the time to hold a hearing on any party’s motion.

We order the county clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, and the court reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record, if any, within 15 days of the date of the hearing. We further order the parties to file a joint status update in 60 days of the date of this order and every 30 days thereafter. This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from the Court’s active docket. The appeal will remain abated until the

supplemental records are filed. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal at any time, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. Any party may file a motion to continue abatement.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __December 17, 2019__

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy (Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin and Wood Master Homes v. Karen Tracy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casillas v. Cano
79 S.W.3d 587 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)