Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill
This text of Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill (Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-3008 ___________________________
Jim Harris, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nina Hill
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Corizon, LLC; Paula Huffman-Reed
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau ____________
Submitted: March 16, 2020 Filed: March 19, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Jim Harris, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment for defendant Nina Hill. Upon de novo review of the record and careful consideration of Harris’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court that Hill was entitled to summary judgment. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (viewing summary judgment record in light most favorable to non-movant and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-harris-jr-v-nina-hill-ca8-2020.