Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2020·No. 18-3008·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 18-3008

Jim Harris, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Nina Hill

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Corizon, LLC; Paula Huffman-Reed

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau

Submitted: March 16, 2020 Filed: March 19, 2020

[Unpublished]

Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Jim Harris, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment for defendant Nina Hill. Upon de novo review of the record and careful consideration of Harris’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court that Hill was entitled to summary judgment. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (viewing summary judgment record in light most favorable to non-movant and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill, (8th Cir. 2020).

Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill (Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles Cullor v. John Baldwin
830 F.3d 830 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)