Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 18-3008
Jim Harris, Jr.
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nina Hill
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Corizon, LLC; Paula Huffman-Reed
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Cape Girardeau
Submitted: March 16, 2020 Filed: March 19, 2020
[Unpublished]
Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, inmate Jim Harris, Jr. appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment for defendant Nina Hill. Upon de novo review of the record and careful consideration of Harris’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court that Hill was entitled to summary judgment. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (viewing summary judgment record in light most favorable to non-movant and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill (Jim Harris, Jr. v. Nina Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.