Jim F. Huffine v. Bank of America, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 25, 2003·No. 02-03-00162-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-162-CV

JIM F. HUFFINE APPELLANT

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.    APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 67 TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

On August 26, 2003, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 25, 2003

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jim F. Huffine v. Bank of America, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Jim F. Huffine v. Bank of America, N.A. (Jim F. Huffine v. Bank of America, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.