Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Tequila Cuervo La Rojena

85 A.D.3d 556, 924 N.Y.S.2d 793
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 16, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 A.D.3d 556 (Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Tequila Cuervo La Rojena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, 85 A.D.3d 556, 924 N.Y.S.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered January 31, 2011, which, in an action alleging breach of a settlement agreement, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined the motion for summary judgment, although it was made more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue. The motion was made pursuant to both a [557]*557stipulation and the court’s own order, upon a showing of “good cause” (CPLR 3212 [a]; cf. Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 651-652 [2004]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Renwick and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BENNETT, AINSWORTH M. v. ST. JOHN'S HOME
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Bennett v. St. John's Home
128 A.D.3d 1428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 A.D.3d 556, 924 N.Y.S.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jim-beam-brands-co-v-tequila-cuervo-la-rojena-nyappdiv-2011.