Jill R. v. Eugene C.
This text of 94 A.D.3d 677 (Jill R. v. Eugene C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Family Court, New York County (Fiordaliza A. Rodriguez, Ref.), entered on or about August 16, 2011, which denied respondent father’s motion to vacate an order of protection and an order suspending visitation, upon the father’s default, and to restore the proceeding to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Application by the father’s assigned counsel to be relieved as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed the record and agree with counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Catterson, Renwick and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.D.3d 677, 942 N.Y.S.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jill-r-v-eugene-c-nyappdiv-2012.