Jiles v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jiles v. State

72 Ga. App. 197

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1945·No. 30774·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the general grounds. The record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credi[198] ble, was sufficient to support the verdict. The jury being the judges of the weight of the evidence, this court can not disturb the judgment refusing a new trial.

Decided March 16, 1945. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. Earl Staples, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the general grounds. The record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credi[198] ble, was sufficient to support the verdict. The jury being the judges of the weight of the evidence, this court can not disturb the judgment refusing a new trial.

Decided March 16, 1945. Willis Smith, for plaintiff in error. Earl Staples, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.

Jiles v. State, 72 Ga. App. 197 (Ga. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

72 Ga. App. 197 (Jiles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.