Jiles v. State
This text of 117 So. 3d 879 (Jiles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the convictions and sentences. Our review of the record, however, indicates a possible sentencing error arising from the mandatory minimum three-year term imposed in L.T. No. 12-654 in connection with count I, Sale/Delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a church. Compare § 893.13(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2011) (not requiring a mandatory term when the sale is within 1000 feet of a physical place of worship), with § 893.13(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring a mandatory term when the sale is within 1000 feet of a park, community center or recreational facility). Three of Jiles’ four cases disposed of by his plea involved sales within 1000 feet of a park, community center or recreational facility and thus properly included the mandatory term. See State v. Mackey, 964 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The fourth case involved the sale or delivery within 1,000 feet of a church. Because no sentencing issues were preserved for appeal, we affirm, but without prejudice to the defendant filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any unpreserved sentencing issue.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 So. 3d 879, 2013 WL 3716949, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jiles-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.