Jiles v. State

117 So. 3d 879, 2013 WL 3716949, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11221
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2013·No. No. 4D12-3134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the convictions and sentences. Our review of the record, however, indicates a possible sentencing error arising from the mandatory minimum three-year term imposed in L.T. No. 12-654 in connection with count I, Sale/Delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a church. Compare § 893.13(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2011) (not requiring a mandatory term when the sale is within 1000 feet of a physical place of worship), with § 893.13(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011) (requiring a mandatory term when the sale is within 1000 feet of a park, community center or recreational facility). Three of Jiles’ four cases disposed of by his plea involved sales within 1000 feet of a park, community center or recreational facility and thus properly included the mandatory term. See State v. Mackey, 964 So.2d 772 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). The fourth case involved the sale or delivery within 1,000 feet of a church. Because no sentencing issues were preserved for appeal, we affirm, but without prejudice to the defendant filing an appropriate post-conviction motion raising any unpreserved sentencing issue.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jiles v. State, 117 So. 3d 879, 2013 WL 3716949, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11221 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

117 So. 3d 879 (Jiles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Mackey
964 So. 2d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)