Jianhua Song v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
This text of Jianhua Song v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Jianhua Song v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-01145-JFW-KS Document 22 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:87
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 22-1145-JFW(KSx) Date: April 20, 2022 Title: Jianhua Song, et al. -v- United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MISJOINDER The Court hereby orders Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, no later than April 22, 2022, why one or more Plaintiffs should not be severed from the action as a result of misjoinder. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a), which allows for permissive joinder, provides, in pertinent part: (1) Plaintiffs. Persons may join in one action as plaintiffs if: (A) they assert any right to relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative in respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences; and (B) any question of law or fact common to all plaintiffs will arise in the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a). Rule 20(a) imposes two specific requirements for proper joinder: “(1) a right to relief must be asserted by . . . each plaintiff . . . relating to or arising out of the same transaction or occurrence; and (2) some question of law or fact common to all the parties will arise in the action.” League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 558 F.2d 914, 917 (9th Cir. 1977). “The first prong, the ‘same transaction’ requirement, refers to similarity in the factual background of a claim.” Coughlin v. Rogers, 130 F.3d 1348, 1350 (9th Cir. 1997). No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 1 of 1 Initials of Deputy Clerk sr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jianhua Song v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jianhua-song-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services-cacd-2022.