Jia Qing Wang v. Mukasey

266 F. App'x 286
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2008
Docket07-1650
StatusUnpublished

This text of 266 F. App'x 286 (Jia Qing Wang v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jia Qing Wang v. Mukasey, 266 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jia Qing Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based upon changed circumstances. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2007); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Nibagwire v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 153, 156 (4th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Wang v. Mukasey, No. A77-977-545 (B.I.A. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty
502 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F. App'x 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jia-qing-wang-v-mukasey-ca4-2008.