J.H. v. State
745 So. 2d 1133, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16877, 1999 WL 1188501
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.H. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6536 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and misdemeanor possession of cannabis. We affirm the conviction for possession of cannabis. We must, however, reverse the conviction for possession of cocaine because the State’s evidence was not inconsistent with Appellant’s reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e.g., Cook v. State, 571 So.2d 530, 531 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J.H. v. State, 745 So. 2d 1133, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16877, 1999 WL 1188501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
745 So. 2d 1133 (J.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. State
571 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)