J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools

W.D. Washington

J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools

DecidedJune 6, 2023

Docket2:23-cv-00191

StatusUnknown

This text of J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools (J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 J.H. and D.H., parents of P.H., a minor, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-191 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNREDACTED 12 v. ADMINSTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL 13 SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to file the 17 administrative record under seal. The Court starts from the position that there is “a strong 18 presumption in favor of access to court records.” Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 19 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). To overcome this presumption, there must be a “compelling reason” for sealing that is “sufficient to outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure.” Kamakana 20 v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006). Compelling reasons exist in 21 this case. The parties’ interests in keeping the information in the record confidential to protect 22 the minor student at issue outweighs the public’s interest in disclosure of these confidential 23 records. See id. Given the volume of the record and the prevalence of sensitive information 24 1 contained in the record, redacting this confidential information would be overly burdensome and 2 would render the record difficult to understand – and thus far less valuable – to the public and the 3 Court. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion and DIRECTS the Clerk 4 to maintain the administrative record under seal once it is filed.

5 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 6 Dated June 6, 2023. A 7 8 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 9

10 Presented by: 11 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 12 By: /s/ Sarah C. Johnson 13 Sarah C. Johnson, WSBA # 34529 Sam E. Chalfant, WSBA # 46080 14 Attorneys for Defendant Seattle Public Schools

15 CASSADY LAW, PLLC 16 By: /s/ Charlotte Cassady 17 Charlotte Cassady, WSBA #19848 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18

19 FEENEY LAW OFFICE, PLLC

20 By: /s/ Kerri Feeney Kerri Feeney, WSBA #34080 21 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 J.H. and D.H., parents of P.H., a minor, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-191 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE UNREDACTED 12 v. ADMINSTRATIVE RECORD UNDER SEAL 13 SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ stipulated motion to file the 17 administrative record under seal. The Court starts from the position that there is “a strong 18 presumption in favor of access to court records.” Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 19 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). To overcome this presumption, there must be a “compelling reason” for sealing that is “sufficient to outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure.” Kamakana 20 v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006). Compelling reasons exist in 21 this case. The parties’ interests in keeping the information in the record confidential to protect 22 the minor student at issue outweighs the public’s interest in disclosure of these confidential 23 records. See id. Given the volume of the record and the prevalence of sensitive information 24 1 contained in the record, redacting this confidential information would be overly burdensome and 2 would render the record difficult to understand – and thus far less valuable – to the public and the 3 Court. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulated motion and DIRECTS the Clerk 4 to maintain the administrative record under seal once it is filed.

5 The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 6 Dated June 6, 2023. A 7 8 Marsha J. Pechman United States Senior District Judge 9

10 Presented by: 11 PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 12 By: /s/ Sarah C. Johnson 13 Sarah C. Johnson, WSBA # 34529 Sam E. Chalfant, WSBA # 46080 14 Attorneys for Defendant Seattle Public Schools

15 CASSADY LAW, PLLC 16 By: /s/ Charlotte Cassady 17 Charlotte Cassady, WSBA #19848 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18

19 FEENEY LAW OFFICE, PLLC

20 By: /s/ Kerri Feeney Kerri Feeney, WSBA #34080 21 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

22 23 24

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

J.H. v. Seattle Public Schools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jh-v-seattle-public-schools-wawd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack