JH v. Department of Children & Families
This text of 924 So. 2d 965 (JH v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J.H., the Father, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*966 Kathleen K. Pena of Law Offices of Kathleen K. Pena, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Tricia D. Brissett, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
WARNER, J.
We reverse the order of the trial court which closed this dependency case by placing the dependent child in the care and custody of her paternal aunt and not the appellant father, but noted that "protective supervision is terminated, pending therapeutic recommendationcase is closed over father's objection." First, the child had not been in the aunt's custody for the required six months pursuant to section 39.622(9), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the court could not terminate protective supervision when it did. Second, it does not appear that the order in fact terminated protective supervision, because it was only terminated "pending therapeutic recommendation." Because there was not yet a therapeutic recommendation, the condition to terminating supervision had not been established, and the court erred in closing the case. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
924 So. 2d 965, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4995, 2006 WL 863731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jh-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2006.