Jh Business Consultants Inc v. Tower Automotive Operations USA III
This text of Jh Business Consultants Inc v. Tower Automotive Operations USA III (Jh Business Consultants Inc v. Tower Automotive Operations USA III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 1, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
144982 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack JH BUSINESS CONSULTANTS, INC. David F. Viviano, and SADHU AUTO PARTS PVT LTD., Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, v SC: 144982 COA: 304592 Oakland CC: 2009-100692-CZ TOWER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS USA III, LLC and TOWER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS USA I, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 1, 2013 _________________________________________ h0325 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jh Business Consultants Inc v. Tower Automotive Operations USA III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jh-business-consultants-inc-v-tower-automotive-ope-mich-2013.