J.F. v. State
This text of 586 So. 2d 100 (J.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An adjudication of delinquency was premised on the theft of an automobile, not identified in the charging document. The proof, at the time of hearing, being different as to ownership from that charged in the charging document, these three adjudications, to wit: grand theft, burglary and criminal mischief, be and they are hereby reversed and set aside. Le Rea v. Cochran, 115 So.2d 545 (Fla.1959); S.T. v. State, 382 So.2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Haugland, v. State, 374 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The remaining adjudication of delinquency, to wit: obstructing a police officer, remains valid.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
586 So. 2d 100, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9935, 1991 WL 193099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jf-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.