J.F. v. Department of Children & Families

64 So. 3d 199, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554, 2011 WL 2622679
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 2011
DocketNo. 4D11-249
StatusPublished

This text of 64 So. 3d 199 (J.F. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.F. v. Department of Children & Families, 64 So. 3d 199, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554, 2011 WL 2622679 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order adjudicating the minor child dependent as to the father is affirmed. The court found that the father had neglected the child through domestic violence. The father has not provided that portion of the trial transcript at which the issue of domestic violence was litigated. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). He contends nevertheless that the order itself shows that the court erred. According to the order, several incidences of domestic violence between the mother and father occurred in the presence of the child, which can constitute evidence of neglect. See C.J. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 968 So.2d 121, 123-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

[200]*200We affirm as to this and all other issues raised.

MAY, C.J., WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
CJ v. Department of Children & Families
968 So. 2d 121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 3d 199, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10554, 2011 WL 2622679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jf-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2011.