J.F. v. Department of Children & Families

936 So. 2d 1210, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14960, 2006 WL 2570825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2006·No. No. 5D06-777·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the termination of the parental rights of the mother, J.F., with respect to her children, A.C. and T.J.C. After careful review we conclude that J.F. was properly served with notice of the termination hearing; that there was clear and convincing evidence that termination of J.F.’s rights was in the best interest of the children; and that the trial judge properly denied J.F.’s motion to set aside default judgment because J.F. failed to satisfy the three-part test set forth in E.S. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 878 So.2d 493, 496 (Fla. 3d DCA2004).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.F. v. Department of Children & Families, 936 So. 2d 1210, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14960, 2006 WL 2570825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

936 So. 2d 1210 (J.F. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Cambron
936 So. 2d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)