J.F. v. City of Woodlake

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 8, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01569·Unknown

Opinion

LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP Van Longyear, CSB No.: 84189 Nicole M. Cahill, CSB No.: 287165 555 University Avenue, Suite 280 Sacramento, CA 95825 Phone: 916-974-8500 Facsimile: 916-974-8510 Emails: longyear@longyearlaw.com cahill@longyearlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant, City of Woodlake

J.F., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-01569-JLT-BAM Litem, LIZ FRANCO; V.F., a minor, by and ) through her Guardian Ad Litem, LIZ ) JOINT STIPULATION AND FRANCO; and M.M., a minor, by and through ) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER her Guardian Ad Litem, JENNIFER ) MENENDEZ, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF WOODLAKE; and DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. The Parties have determined that certain documents that may be subject to disclosure in this action contain information that is (a) confidential, sensitive, or potentially invasive of an individual’s privacy interests; (b) not generally known; and (c) not normally revealed to the public or third parties, or if disclosed to third parties, would require such third parties to maintain the information in confidence. This confidential or private information warrants special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order on the basis that the documents described herein and anticipated to be subject to disclosure in this matter contain confidential and protected information that may only be disclosed and/or produced subject to the following terms, unless timely challenged subject to the provisions in Section 6, below. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Protected Material, as defined in Section 2.13 below and marked as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this order. 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. / / / 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is within the scope of this order as described in Section 3 below and thereafter designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The documents eligible for protection under this Order are: ▪ Law enforcement personnel file documents and materials that concern, relate, or refer to fitness for duty reports and evaluations, performance evaluations, discipline, awards, commendations and recognition, reassignments or position changes, employee personal data, and related records; and ▪ Police Department internal investigation documents and materials including internal affairs investigation files, citizen complaints, personnel file documents and data, incident reports, log books, and other related records. ▪ Records and investigative materials pertaining to ongoing criminal investigations and/or prosecutions. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably with

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.F. v. City of Woodlake, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

J.F. v. City of Woodlake (J.F. v. City of Woodlake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)