J.F. v. City of Woodlake

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedApril 8, 2024
Docket1:23-cv-01569
StatusUnknown

This text of J.F. v. City of Woodlake (J.F. v. City of Woodlake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.F. v. City of Woodlake, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

LONGYEAR & LAVRA, LLP 1 Van Longyear, CSB No.: 84189 Nicole M. Cahill, CSB No.: 287165 2 555 University Avenue, Suite 280 Sacramento, CA 95825 3 Phone: 916-974-8500 Facsimile: 916-974-8510 4 Emails: longyear@longyearlaw.com cahill@longyearlaw.com 5

6 Attorneys for Defendant, City of Woodlake 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

11 J.F., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-01569-JLT-BAM Litem, LIZ FRANCO; V.F., a minor, by and ) 12 through her Guardian Ad Litem, LIZ ) JOINT STIPULATION AND FRANCO; and M.M., a minor, by and through ) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 her Guardian Ad Litem, JENNIFER ) MENENDEZ, ) 14 ) Plaintiffs, ) 15 ) v. ) 16 ) CITY OF WOODLAKE; and DOES 1-10, ) 17 inclusive, ) ) 18 Defendants. ) 19 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 22 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. The Parties have 23 determined that certain documents that may be subject to disclosure in this action contain 24 information that is (a) confidential, sensitive, or potentially invasive of an individual’s privacy 25 interests; (b) not generally known; and (c) not normally revealed to the public or third parties, or 26 if disclosed to third parties, would require such third parties to maintain the information in 27 confidence. This confidential or private information warrants special protection from public 28 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. 1 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 2 Stipulated Protective Order on the basis that the documents described herein and anticipated to 3 be subject to disclosure in this matter contain confidential and protected information that may 4 only be disclosed and/or produced subject to the following terms, unless timely challenged 5 subject to the provisions in Section 6, below. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not 6 confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 7 affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 8 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further 9 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 11.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not 10 entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures 11 that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 12 the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 15 information or items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Protected Material, as defined in Section 17 2.13 below and marked as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this order. 18 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record (as well as their support staff). 19 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 20 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 21 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 22 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 23 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 24 responses to discovery in this matter. 25 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 26 litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 27 consultant in this action. 28 / / / 1 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 2 entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.9 Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are 4 retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of 5 that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 6 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 7 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staffs). 8 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 9 Material in this action. 10 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 11 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 12 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 13 subcontractors. 14 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is within the scope of 15 this order as described in Section 3 below and thereafter designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 17 Producing Party. 18 3. SCOPE 19 The documents eligible for protection under this Order are: 20 ▪ Law enforcement personnel file documents and materials that concern, relate, or refer 21 to fitness for duty reports and evaluations, performance evaluations, discipline, 22 awards, commendations and recognition, reassignments or position changes, 23 employee personal data, and related records; and 24 ▪ Police Department internal investigation documents and materials including internal 25 affairs investigation files, citizen complaints, personnel file documents and data, 26 incident reports, log books, and other related records. 27 ▪ Records and investigative materials pertaining to ongoing criminal investigations 28 and/or prosecutions. 1 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 2 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 3 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 4 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 5 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 6 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 7 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 8 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 9 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 10 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 11 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 12 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 13 4. DURATION 14 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 15 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 16 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims 17 and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 18 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 19 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 20 applicable law. 21 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 22 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
J.F. v. City of Woodlake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jf-v-city-of-woodlake-caed-2024.