Jezdimir v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jezdimir v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n

204 So. 3d 520, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11709

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 2016·No. No. 4D15-754·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the final judgment of foreclosure. We affirm on the issues raised, except for the calculation of interest and the inclusion of an. inspection fee in the amount due. The appellee Bank concedes that the interest in the final judgment was incorrect, although there was sufficient evidence presented to calculate it. The Bank also concedes that there was not sufficient proof of the inspection fee. We thus reverse for further proceedings to correct the interest in the final judgment and remove the inspection fee.

WARNER, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the final judgment of foreclosure. We affirm on the issues raised, except for the calculation of interest and the inclusion of an. inspection fee in the amount due. The appellee Bank concedes that the interest in the final judgment was incorrect, although there was sufficient evidence presented to calculate it. The Bank also concedes that there was not sufficient proof of the inspection fee. We thus reverse for further proceedings to correct the interest in the final judgment and remove the inspection fee.

WARNER, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Jezdimir v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n, 204 So. 3d 520, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11709 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

204 So. 3d 520 (Jezdimir v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.