Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Inc.

139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.2d 421 (Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, Inc., 139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.), entered November 19, 1986, which granted the motion of plaintiffs for an order compelling defendant Abramowitz to answer certain questions at his deposition and denied defendants’ cross motion for a protective order, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts and in the exercise of discretion, solely to the extent of directing that the identity of the individuals disclosed by defendant shall be kept confidential by plaintiffs’ counsel subject to further order by the IAS court, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[422]*422We agree with the Supreme Court that the information sought may be material and necessary. However, we modify solely to insure that the rights of the nonparties are protected insofar as possible under the continuing supervision of that court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Sandler, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.), entered November 19, 1986, which granted the motion of plaintiffs for an order compelling defendant Abramowitz to answer certain questions at his deposition and denied defendants’ cross motion for a protective order, is unanimously modified, on the law and facts and in the exercise of discretion, solely to the extent of directing that the identity of the individuals disclosed by defendant shall be kept confidential by plaintiffs’ counsel subject to further order by the IAS court, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[422]*422We agree with the Supreme Court that the information sought may be material and necessary. However, we modify solely to insure that the rights of the nonparties are protected insofar as possible under the continuing supervision of that court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Sandler, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 421, 526 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jews-for-jesus-inc-v-jewish-community-relations-council-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1988.