Jewish Mental Health Society v. Village of Hastings

297 U.S. 696
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 2, 1936·No. No. 729·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365, 387-389; Jack Lewis, Inc., v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al., 290 U. S. 585; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U. S. 526, 530, 531; Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U. S. 394; Reinman v. Little Rock, [697]*697237 U. S. 171, 176, 177.

Messrs. Sidney Newb'org and Edward M. Bassett for appellant. Mr. Frank H. Myers for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewish Mental Health Society v. Village of Hastings, 297 U.S. 696 (1936).

297 U.S. 696 (Jewish Mental Health Society v. Village of Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reinman v. City of Little Rock
237 U.S. 171 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Hadacheck v. Sebastian
239 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago
242 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
272 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore
290 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1933)