Jewish Center for the Aged v. Haravitch
254 S.W.3d 267, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2008 WL 2246928
Opinion
ORDER
Esther Haravitch appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her counterclaim against Jewish Center for the Aged. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jewish Center for the Aged v. Haravitch, 254 S.W.3d 267, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 754, 2008 WL 2246928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
254 S.W.3d 267 (Jewish Center for the Aged v. Haravitch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ross
254 S.W.3d 267 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)