Jewell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jewell v. State

345 So. 2d 1103, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15911

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1977

DocketNo. CC-2

StatusPublished

This text of 345 So. 2d 1103 (Jewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewell v. State, 345 So. 2d 1103, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15911 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points on this appeal. He first contends the trial court committed fundamental error in certain comments made to the jury in open court in the presence of appellant and his counsel in response to a question asked by the jury after they had retired. We find no error. [1104]*1104By his second point, appellant contends that the trial court erred in not crediting county jail time prior to sentencing on the last sentence which he received. Such credit should have been given. See Coleman v. State, 326 So.2d 217 (Fla. 2 DCA 1976). The judgment is affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court to give appellant credit on his sentence for the aforesaid county jail time. Such may be done by order without returning appellant to the court.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two points on this appeal. He first contends the trial court committed fundamental error in certain comments made to the jury in open court in the presence of appellant and his counsel in response to a question asked by the jury after they had retired. We find no error. [1104]*1104By his second point, appellant contends that the trial court erred in not crediting county jail time prior to sentencing on the last sentence which he received. Such credit should have been given. See Coleman v. State, 326 So.2d 217 (Fla. 2 DCA 1976). The judgment is affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court to give appellant credit on his sentence for the aforesaid county jail time. Such may be done by order without returning appellant to the court.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 1103, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack