Jewell v. McKinley

54 Cal. 600
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 6,028·Published

Opinion

Department No. 1, by the Court:

To determine the questions argued in the briefs of counsel, would be to determine the cause on the merits in advance, of the trial. This, as the case is presented, we think we ought not to do. We therefore express no opinion as to the validity or invalidity of the ordinance under which the defendants seek to justify their obstruction of the street in question, but upon the authority of Parrott v. Floyd, 54 Cal. 534, affirm the order.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewell v. McKinley, 54 Cal. 600 (Cal. 1880).

54 Cal. 600 (Jewell v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parrott v. Floyd
54 Cal. 534 (California Supreme Court, 1880)