Jewell v. Huckins

106 A. 480, 79 N.H. 153, 1919 N.H. LEXIS 9
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedFebruary 4, 1919
StatusPublished

This text of 106 A. 480 (Jewell v. Huckins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jewell v. Huckins, 106 A. 480, 79 N.H. 153, 1919 N.H. LEXIS 9 (N.H. 1919).

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

The quitclaim deed of the bank to George E. Jewell conveyed to him the title of the bank in the premises, which was that of a mortgagee in possession for the purpose of foreclosure; and by his continued possession under the deed the foreclosure became complete. Green v. Currier, 63 N. H. 563, 564. The only objection made to the sufficiency of the foreclosure is the claimed incapacity of the quitclaim deed to convey the bank’s interest. The authorities are against the contention. Hinds v. Ballou, 44 N. H. *154 619; Lamprey v. Nudd, 29 N. H. 299; Thorndike v. Norris, 24 N. H. 454, 460.

The defendants therefore can acquire no interest in the property by attachment and levy against the heirs of the original mortgagor.

Case discharged.

Plummer, J., was absent: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Currier
3 A. 428 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A. 480, 79 N.H. 153, 1919 N.H. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-huckins-nh-1919.