Jewell v. Heinzel
This text of 6 Daly 411 (Jewell v. Heinzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a judgment is taken by default before a justice, and an appeal is brought to set aside the judgment, the appellant must not only excuse his default, but satisfy the court by affidavit that manifest injustice has been done. The defense which he has, must be clearly set forth and sworn to, and if contradicted by the affidavit of the respondent it must be corroborated. A mere affidavit of merits is not enough (Fowler v. Colyer, 2 E. D. Smith, 125 ; Gottsberger v. Harned, Id. 128; Van Wyck v. Kelly, Id. 128), which is all that is submitted by the defendant upon this appeal. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.
Joseph F. Daly and Van Hoesen, JJ., concurred.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Daly 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-heinzel-nyctcompl-1876.