Jewell v. Heinzel

6 Daly 411
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 3, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 Daly 411 (Jewell v. Heinzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jewell v. Heinzel, 6 Daly 411 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Opinion

Charles P. Daly, Chief Justice.

Where a judgment is taken by default before a justice, and an appeal is brought to set aside the judgment, the appellant must not only excuse his default, but satisfy the court by affidavit that manifest injustice has been done. The defense which he has, must be clearly set forth and sworn to, and if contradicted by the affidavit of the respondent it must be corroborated. A mere affidavit of merits is not enough (Fowler v. Colyer, 2 E. D. Smith, 125 ; Gottsberger v. Harned, Id. 128; Van Wyck v. Kelly, Id. 128), which is all that is submitted by the defendant upon this appeal. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Joseph F. Daly and Van Hoesen, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hertzberg v. Elvidge
79 Misc. 109 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)
Coleman v. Keady
53 Misc. 520 (New York County Courts, 1907)
Mullane v. Roberge
21 Misc. 342 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Jacobs v. Zeltner
30 N.Y.S. 238 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Daly 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-heinzel-nyctcompl-1876.