Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution

236 Md. 643

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 16, 1964

DocketApp. No. 62

StatusPublished

This text of 236 Md. 643 (Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 236 Md. 643 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v. Director, 235 Md. 668.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v. Director, 235 Md. 668.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 Md. 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewell-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack