Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution
236 Md. 643
Opinion
This is the third time that the applicant has been found to be a defective delinquent, but the first time he has applied for leave to appeal. The record contains evidence to support the determination of defective delinquency. It is well settled that the testimony of Dr. Boslow is admissible, although based in part upon the medical findings of others. Dickerson v. Director, 235 Md. 668.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 236 Md. 643 (Md. 1964).
236 Md. 643 (Jewell v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickerson v. Director of Patuxent Institution
202 A.2d 765 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)