Jewel Productions, Inc. v. Morgenthau

Second Circuit

Jewel Productions, Inc. v. Morgenthau

100 F.2d 390, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2657

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedDecember 5, 1938

DocketNo. 86

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 100 F.2d 390 (Jewel Productions, Inc. v. Morgenthau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewel Productions, Inc. v. Morgenthau, 100 F.2d 390, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2657 (2d Cir. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of the Treasury has not been made a party in this suit, either in[391]*391dividually or in his official capacity, for no service has been effected. No suit will lie against the Collector alone. The Collector is a subordinate official of the Treasury Department and the Secretary of the Treasury is an indispensable party defendant. The bill was dismissed on the merits after denial of a motion for a temporary injunction. The decree is reversed with directions to dismiss the bill for lack of the necessary party defendant. Webster v. Fall, 266 U.S. 507, 45 S.Ct. 148, 69 L.Ed. 411; Gnerich v. Rutter, 265 U.S. 388, 44 S.Ct. 532, 68 L.Ed. 1068; National Conference, etc., Inc., v. Goldman, 2 Cir., 85 F.2d 66; Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., v. Farley, 2 Cir., 71 F.2d 288; Alcohol Warehouse Corp. v. Canfield, 2 Cir., 11 F. 2d 214.

Decree reversed with directions to dismiss the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of the Treasury has not been made a party in this suit, either in[391]*391dividually or in his official capacity, for no service has been effected. No suit will lie against the Collector alone. The Collector is a subordinate official of the Treasury Department and the Secretary of the Treasury is an indispensable party defendant. The bill was dismissed on the merits after denial of a motion for a temporary injunction. The decree is reversed with directions to dismiss the bill for lack of the necessary party defendant. Webster v. Fall, 266 U.S. 507, 45 S.Ct. 148, 69 L.Ed. 411; Gnerich v. Rutter, 265 U.S. 388, 44 S.Ct. 532, 68 L.Ed. 1068; National Conference, etc., Inc., v. Goldman, 2 Cir., 85 F.2d 66; Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc., v. Farley, 2 Cir., 71 F.2d 288; Alcohol Warehouse Corp. v. Canfield, 2 Cir., 11 F. 2d 214.

Decree reversed with directions to dismiss the bill.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 F.2d 390, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewel-productions-inc-v-morgenthau-ca2-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack