Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.
318 U.S. 746, 63 S. Ct. 996
This text of 318 U.S. 746 (Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co., 318 U.S. 746, 63 S. Ct. 996 (1943).
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Ex parte Cutting, 94 U. S. 14; Credits Commutation Co. v. United States, 177 U. S. 311, and United States v. California Coöperative Canneries, 279 [747]*747U. S. 553, 556.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ex Parte Cutting
94 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1877)
Credits Commutation Co. v. United States
177 U.S. 311 (Supreme Court, 1900)
United States v. California Coöperative Canneries
279 U.S. 553 (Supreme Court, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
318 U.S. 746, 63 S. Ct. 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewel-incandescent-lamp-co-v-general-electric-co-scotus-1943.