Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.
318 U.S. 746, 63 S. Ct. 996
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Ex parte Cutting, 94 U. S. 14; Credits Commutation Co. v. United States, 177 U. S. 311, and United States v. California Coöperative Canneries, 279 [747]*747U. S. 553, 556.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co., 318 U.S. 746, 63 S. Ct. 996 (1943).
318 U.S. 746 (Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co. v. General Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Cutting
94 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1877)
Credits Commutation Co. v. United States
177 U.S. 311 (Supreme Court, 1900)
United States v. California Coöperative Canneries
279 U.S. 553 (Supreme Court, 1929)