Home/Sixth Circuit/Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Company, D/B/A Jewel Mart

Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Company, D/B/A Jewel Mart

575 F.2d 1176, 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 584, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1978
Docket76-1764
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 575 F.2d 1176 (Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Company, D/B/A Jewel Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Company, D/B/A Jewel Mart, 575 F.2d 1176, 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 584, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184 (6th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellee Jewel Companies, Inc., filed this action for injunctive and compensatory relief against The Westhall Company, d/b/a Jewel Mart, alleging that defendant’s use of the word “Jewel” in its Jewel Mart stores unfairly infringed upon appellant’s “Jewel Home Shopping Service.” District Judge Thomas D. Lambros entered judgment in favor of the defendant. Reference is made to the comprehensive opinion of the district court for a recitation of pertinent facts. Jewel Companies, Inc. v. The Westhall Co., 413 F.Supp. 994 (N.D. Ohio 1976).

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral arguments, and the entire record, the court concludes that the findings of fact of the district court are not clearly erroneous, Fed. R.Civ.P. 52(a), and that no reversible error is disclosed by the record.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc.
924 F. Supp. 1474 (N.D. Ohio, 1996)
Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. v. Augustine Medical, Inc.
800 F. Supp. 1549 (S.D. Ohio, 1992)
Worthington Foods, Inc. v. Kellogg Co.
732 F. Supp. 1417 (S.D. Ohio, 1990)
Barrios v. American Thermal Instruments, Inc.
712 F. Supp. 611 (S.D. Ohio, 1988)
Diamond Co. v. Gentry Acquisition Corp.
531 N.E.2d 777 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1988)
Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Ameritech
811 F.2d 960 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Cesare v. Work
520 N.E.2d 586 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1987)
Pizzazz Pizza & Restaurant v. Taco Bell Corp.
642 F. Supp. 88 (N.D. Ohio, 1986)
Hindu Incense, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Charles Meadows and Dorothy Meadows, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
692 F.2d 1048 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)
Day v. Video Connection of Solon, Ohio
602 F. Supp. 100 (N.D. Ohio, 1982)
Cebu Ass'n of California, Inc. v. Santo Nino De Cebu USA, Inc.
95 Cal. App. 3d 129 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F.2d 1176, 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 584, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jewel-companies-inc-v-the-westhall-company-dba-jewel-mart-ca6-1978.