Jeung Juen Ho v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Jeung Juen Ho v. United States

118 F. 1017, 54 C.C.A. 681, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1902

DocketNo. 755

StatusPublished

This text of 118 F. 1017 (Jeung Juen Ho v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeung Juen Ho v. United States, 118 F. 1017, 54 C.C.A. 681, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612 (9th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are stronger for the government than were those in the cases of Jeung üin Heung v. U. S. (No. 764) 116 Fed. 1020, and Lee Ah Yin v. U. S. (No. 756) 116 Fed. 614, disposed of at the last term of the court. What was then said by this court, applied to the record in the present case, necessitates an affirmance of the judgment appealed from. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are stronger for the government than were those in the cases of Jeung üin Heung v. U. S. (No. 764) 116 Fed. 1020, and Lee Ah Yin v. U. S. (No. 756) 116 Fed. 614, disposed of at the last term of the court. What was then said by this court, applied to the record in the present case, necessitates an affirmance of the judgment appealed from. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F. 1017, 54 C.C.A. 681, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeung-juen-ho-v-united-states-ca9-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack