Jeune v. State
181 So. 3d 1250, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19200, 2015 WL 9319148
Opinion
Affirmed: See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla.2001) (holding that rule 3.800(a) “is not a vehicle designed to reexamine whether the procedure employed to impose the punishment comported with statutory law and due process”)(quoting with approval Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)); Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1181 (Fla.2001) (holding “a sentence is ‘illegal’ if it imposes a kind of punishment that no judge under the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual circumstances”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jeune v. State, 181 So. 3d 1250, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19200, 2015 WL 9319148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
181 So. 3d 1250 (Jeune v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carter v. State
786 So. 2d 1173 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Judge v. State
596 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Bover v. State
797 So. 2d 1246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)