Jett v. Lord
86 S.E. 1092, 144 Ga. 234, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 149
Opinion
1. In the light of the notes by the judge and the evidence admitted without objection, the .grounds of the motion for new trial complaining of the rejection of certain evidence, in so far as they were approved by the judge, show no error requiring the grant of a new trial.
2. The verdict for the defendant was authorized by the evidence, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jett v. Lord, 86 S.E. 1092, 144 Ga. 234, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 149 (Ga. 1915).
86 S.E. 1092 (Jett v. Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sumner v. Sumner
197 S.E. 833 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)