Jett v. Lord

86 S.E. 1092, 144 Ga. 234, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. In the light of the notes by the judge and the evidence admitted without objection, the .grounds of the motion for new trial complaining of the rejection of certain evidence, in so far as they were approved by the judge, show no error requiring the grant of a new trial.

2. The verdict for the defendant was authorized by the evidence, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bech, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jett v. Lord, 86 S.E. 1092, 144 Ga. 234, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 149 (Ga. 1915).

86 S.E. 1092 (Jett v. Lord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sumner v. Sumner
197 S.E. 833 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)