Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co.

4 Munf. 80

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedDecember 1, 1813

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 80 (Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeter v. Taliaferro, Stuart, & Co., 4 Munf. 80 (Va. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

the president pronounced the Court’s opinion, that the judgment of the County Court was erroneous in this, that the deposition of Humphrey Stuart was allowed to go in evidence to the jury, when the defendant, now plaintiff', who attended at Lynchburg the day the same was taken, was not allowed to cross-examine the said witness.

Both judgments reversed, and the cause remanded to the said Superior Court of Law, and from thence to the County Court for a new trial to be had therein, on which trial the deposition aforesaid is not to be read in evidence to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

the president pronounced the Court’s opinion, that the judgment of the County Court was erroneous in this, that the deposition of Humphrey Stuart was allowed to go in evidence to the jury, when the defendant, now plaintiff', who attended at Lynchburg the day the same was taken, was not allowed to cross-examine the said witness.

Both judgments reversed, and the cause remanded to the said Superior Court of Law, and from thence to the County Court for a new trial to be had therein, on which trial the deposition aforesaid is not to be read in evidence to the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Munf. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeter-v-taliaferro-stuart-co-va-1813.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack