Jeter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Jeter v. State

75 S.W.2d 1112

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 14, 1934

DocketNo. 16999

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.W.2d 1112 (Jeter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jeter v. State, 75 S.W.2d 1112 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presid’ing Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard upon the trial is not before the reviewing court.

There are various requests for special charges and some exceptions and objections to the court’s charge, but, in the absence of the statement of facts, we are unable to perceive any matter presented for review which would authorize an annulment of the judgment of conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presid’ing Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The evidence heard upon the trial is not before the reviewing court.

There are various requests for special charges and some exceptions and objections to the court’s charge, but, in the absence of the statement of facts, we are unable to perceive any matter presented for review which would authorize an annulment of the judgment of conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.W.2d 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeter-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.