Jeter v. State Ex Rel. Tuck

117 So. 462, 218 Ala. 15, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 138
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 14, 1928
Docket6 Div. 139.
StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 462 (Jeter v. State Ex Rel. Tuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jeter v. State Ex Rel. Tuck, 117 So. 462, 218 Ala. 15, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 138 (Ala. 1928).

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

J. M. Tuck, appellee here, is the duly elected and qualified constable of precinct 21 in Jefferson county, Ala. On his petition for mandamus he recovered a judgment against Mark D. Jeter as clerk of the Third division of the municipal court of Birmingham in a mandamus proceeding, from which Jeter prosecutes this appeal.

The question of law here involved is identical with that determined in the case of Mark D. Jeter, as Clerk, v. State ex rel. J. D. Carlisle, as Constable (Sixth Division 338) ante, p. 12, 117 So. 460, this day decided; the two cases being here submitted as one case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeter v. State Ex Rel. Carlisle
117 So. 460 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 462, 218 Ala. 15, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jeter-v-state-ex-rel-tuck-ala-1928.