Jeter v. Palmetto Health

515 F. App'x 234
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2013·No. No. 13-1018·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jesse James Jeter appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment against Jet-er’s claims, which arose under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeter v. Palmetto Health, No. 3:10-cv-02832-CMC, 2012 WL 6521454 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2012). To the extent that Jeter’s informal reply brief contains a motion to amend a motion that he had previously filed in the district court, we deny his request. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeter v. Palmetto Health, 515 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2013).

515 F. App'x 234 (Jeter v. Palmetto Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 12101-12213
42 U.S.C. § 12101-12213