Jeter v. Kijakazi
Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 3:21-cv-000264-MR
SHAMEKA MONEE JETER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) O R D E R ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs1 under Equal Access to Justice Act [Doc. 20] and the parties’ Stipulation for Payment of Attorney’s Fees [Doc. 21]. The Plaintiff seeks an award of attorneys’ fees in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”). [Doc. 20]. The parties have stipulated to an award of $5,500.00. [Doc. 21]. In light of the Court’s prior remand of this matter, and in the absence of any contention by the Commissioner that her position was substantially justified or that special
1 Despite its title, the Plaintiff does not appear to seek the recovery of any costs by this motion. circumstances exist that would render an award of attorney’s fees unjust, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney’s fees
under the EAJA. The parties have further stipulated that the EAJA award should be paid directly to Plaintiff’s counsel as the Plaintiff’s assignee. In support of this
request, the Plaintiff has submitted a fee agreement executed by the Plaintiff, pursuant to which the Plaintiff has agreed to assign any EAJA fee award in favor of counsel. [Doc. 22]. The Court finds that the Commissioner should accept this assignment of the awarded fees by the Plaintiff to counsel and
upon receipt of such assignment, the Commissioner will pay that award of fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, provided that it is shown that the Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States Government which is subject to
offset. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 286 (2010). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: (1) The Plaintiff’s Motion [Doc. 20] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of Five Thousand
Five Hundred Dollars ($5,500.00), which sum is in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d);
2 (2) Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, or some other time as determined by the Court upon good cause shown, the Commissioner shall inform Plaintiff's counsel whether the Plaintiff owes a debt to the Government by which this fee award
may be offset. Before any funds are disbursed to counsel, the Plaintiff's counsel shall provide a valid fee assignment to the Defendant; 3) In the event that past-due benefits are awarded on remand, the Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days after being served with notice of the past-due benefits award to file for an award of fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b); and (4) No additional Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) may be filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: January 3, 2023
Martifi Reidinger ee Chief United States District Judge AS
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jeter v. Kijakazi (Jeter v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.