Jet Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bennie Mae Lindsay, Adm'x

232 F.2d 889, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3106
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1956·No. 12700·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, from a judgment for $35,-000 entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of the appellee, administratrix of her deceased husband, against the appellant, Jet Motor Lines, Inc., has been heard and duly considered upon the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and upon the record in the case;

And it appearing that no reversible error was committed in the trial court and that, under Ohio law, a jury issue was presented (see, among other cases, Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Company, 132 Ohio St. 271, 7 N.E.2d 220; Brown v. Wachman, 87 Ohio App. 61, 86 N.E.2d 27, 87 N.E.2d 271); and it appearing further that Ross v. Burgan, 163 Ohio St. 211, 126 N.E.2d 592, heavily stressed by appellant, is distinguishable on its facts;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jet Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bennie Mae Lindsay, Adm'x, 232 F.2d 889, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3106 (6th Cir. 1956).

232 F.2d 889 (Jet Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bennie Mae Lindsay, Adm'x) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Wackman
87 N.E.2d 271 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1949)
Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.
7 N.E.2d 220 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1937)