Jesus Vargas v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
This text of Jesus Vargas v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (Jesus Vargas v. Lockheed Martin Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 JESUS VARGAS. Case № 2:25-cv-04288-ODW (PVCx) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 14 THE BOEING COMPANY et al., DISMISS AS MOOT [15] 15 Defendants. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 On June 3, 2025, Defendant The Boeing Company served Plaintiff Jesus Vargas 2 || with a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the First Amended 3 || Complaint in this case. (ECF No. 15.) On June 16, 2025, pursuant to the stipulation 4|| of the parties and the Court’s leave, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. 5 || (ECF No. 19.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) allows plaintiffs to file an 6 || amended complaint with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. 7|| Therefore, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was proper. As the pending 8 | motion to dismiss is based on a pleading that is no longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. (ECF No. 15); see Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 10 | 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 June 17, 2025 15 es
7 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II ig UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesus Vargas v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-vargas-v-lockheed-martin-corporation-cacd-2025.