Jesus Ramirezrosales v. the State of Texas
This text of Jesus Ramirezrosales v. the State of Texas (Jesus Ramirezrosales v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-24-00185-CR No. 02-24-00186-CR ___________________________
JESUS RAMIREZROSALES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 1798140, 1799933
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Birdwell MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jesus Ramirezrosales attempts to appeal his two convictions, but he
waived his right to appeal in each case as part of his plea bargains with the State.
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only[] (A) those matters that
were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial
court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized
by statute.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02. The
trial court must file a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal, clarifying whether
the case involved a plea bargain and the defendant waived his right to appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
Appellant’s judgments of conviction reflect that, in both of his cases, he
pleaded guilty and the trial court sentenced him in accordance with the “Terms of
[his] Plea Bargain.” The plea-bargain paperwork accompanying these judgments—
paperwork that was signed by both Appellant and his trial counsel—further confirms
that Appellant “waive[d] all rights of appeal.” And the trial court’s certifications show
this as well, stating that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal” and that the
cases are “plea-bargain case[s], and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See id.
Because a criminal appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the
defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record,” Tex. R. App.
P. 25.2(d), we warned Appellant via letter that we would dismiss his appeals unless,
2 within ten days, he showed grounds for continuing them.1 See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(d), 44.3. We received no response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals based on the trial court’s certifications. See
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
/s/ Wade Birdwell
Wade Birdwell Justice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: August 1, 2024
1 Our initial letter to Appellant was returned to us, so we obtained updated contact information for him and re-sent the letter to his new address. More than a month has passed since we sent the second letter, and it has not been returned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesus Ramirezrosales v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-ramirezrosales-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.