Jesus Perez Saldana v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 22, 2004
Docket13-04-00105-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jesus Perez Saldana v. State (Jesus Perez Saldana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jesus Perez Saldana v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-105-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________


JESUS SALDANA PEREZ,                                                  Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.


On appeal from the 357th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, JESUS SALDANA PEREZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on September 2, 2003. A timely motion for new trial was filed on September 29, 2003. The notice of appeal was due to be filed on December 1, 2003, but was not filed until January 27, 2004. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.

         Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s untimely motion to permit late filing of notice of appeal is dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 22nd day of April, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jesus Perez Saldana v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-perez-saldana-v-state-texapp-2004.