Jesus Martinez Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Jesus Martinez Jr. v. the State of Texas (Jesus Martinez Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00191-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
JESUS MARTINEZ JR., Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on its own motion. Briefs for both appellant and the
State have been filed, and the case is ready for submission. Upon review, it was noted
by the Court that Luis Martinez, counsel for appellant, is now appearing on behalf of the
State of Texas in other cases pending before the Court. This sequence of events requires
us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.6, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED and cause
REMANDED to the trial court.
Upon remand, the trial court shall use whatever means necessary to make
appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether Luis
Martinez should be removed as appellant’s counsel; and (2) whether appellant is indigent
and entitled to court-appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that present counsel
should be removed and appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel, the
trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If new counsel
is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number
of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.
The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any
orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be filed in a supplemental
clerk’s record. Additionally, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record of
any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental
reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the
expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 19th day of July, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jesus Martinez Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jesus-martinez-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.